A single surgical procedure
Both stages are carried out in one operation, under general anaesthesia, typically lasting between 6 and 12 hours.
At Quenet-Torrent Institute, we have a specialized unit for the surgical approach to peritoneal carcinomatosis, an advanced form of tumor dissemination. We combine cytoreductive surgery, with or without HIPEC, in a multidisciplinary environment with high-complexity technology.
CONTACT SPECIALISTPeritoneal carcinomatosis is treated with complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus HIPEC in selected patients. At Quenet-Torrent Institute (Centro Médico Teknon Barcelona · Memorial Publio Cordón Hospital Madrid), the team led by Dr. François Quenet (principal investigator of the PRODIGE 7 trial, The Lancet Oncology 2021) and Dr. Juan José Torrent has performed over 500 CRS+HIPEC procedures.
Peritoneal carcinomatosis may present with progressive abdominal distension, fluid accumulation in the abdomen (ascites), diffuse abdominal pain or discomfort, early satiety, loss of appetite and weight, and altered bowel transit that in advanced cases may lead to partial or complete obstruction. Severe fatigue is also a frequent symptom in these patients.
In many cases, symptoms appear during follow-up of a previously diagnosed digestive or gynaecological cancer. When they occur in combination, or when signs of new dissemination are detected during a routine review, it is essential to consult a team specialised in peritoneal oncology for an early assessment that allows the available therapeutic options to be evaluated.
Peritoneal carcinomatosis results from the spread of tumour cells from a primary tumour to the peritoneum. The most frequent origins are digestive tumours (colon, rectum, stomach, appendix and pancreas), gynaecological tumours (primarily ovarian cancer), primary peritoneal mesothelioma, and pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendiceal origin.
The risk of developing peritoneal carcinomatosis depends largely on the characteristics of the primary tumour: serosal involvement, tumour perforation during progression or surgery, and an advanced stage at the time of initial diagnosis are factors that increase the likelihood of peritoneal dissemination. Understanding these factors is key to oncological follow-up and the early detection of peritoneal involvement.
The most effective treatment for this condition is cytoreductive surgery, which aims to remove all visible macroscopic disease, followed in selected cases by HIPEC, a perfusion of heated chemotherapy delivered directly into the abdominal cavity.
Both stages are carried out in one operation, under general anaesthesia, typically lasting between 6 and 12 hours.
Heat delivered locally increases the effect of the drug on residual tumour cells while avoiding the usual systemic toxicity.
The procedure is indicated exclusively in patients assessed by a multidisciplinary oncology board.
At Quenet-Torrent Institute every case undergoes a detailed review to establish whether the treatment is genuinely feasible.
Dr. Juan José Torrent Correa explains how peritoneal carcinomatosis is approached through a multidisciplinary strategy combining systemic treatment, cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Video in Spanish.
The PRODIGE 7 trial, led by Dr. François Quénet and published in The Lancet Oncology, compared cytoreductive surgery alone with cytoreductive surgery plus short-course oxaliplatin HIPEC in patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin. With that specific protocol, HIPEC did not improve overall survival and was associated with a higher rate of late postoperative complications.
The meaningful reading of the trial is not that surgery has lost its role, but the opposite. Both arms exceeded 40 months of median survival, far beyond what systemic treatment alone would achieve. What sustains that result is complete cytoreduction, meaning the genuine ability to remove all visible disease. Surgical technique and patient selection weigh more heavily than the addition of the perfusion itself.
An international analysis published in BJS Open in 2024, covering more than 2,000 patients, found variable outcomes across HIPEC regimens, though its retrospective design prevents any claim of superiority. This is why HIPEC is not applied automatically at Quenet-Torrent Institute: it is indicated according to tumour origin, available protocol, prior treatment and board assessment.
The Peritoneal Cancer Index is the standard tool for measuring how much disease is present and where. It divides the abdomen into 13 regions and scores the size of tumour implants in each from 0 to 3, up to a maximum of 39 points.
A low score indicates more limited disease and therefore a greater chance of achieving complete cytoreduction. However, no single figure automatically indicates or rules out surgery: the location of the implants can matter as much as the number. A moderate PCI with diffuse involvement of the small bowel and its mesentery may be far less operable than a higher PCI concentrated in accessible areas.
It is also worth knowing that imaging tends to underestimate the true PCI, since millimetric implants are not always visible. The definitive index is established in theatre, during surgical exploration.
No visible disease remains after surgery. This is the goal of the procedure and the scenario associated with the best long-term outcomes.
Residual nodules smaller than 2.5 mm persist, a size that intraperitoneal chemotherapy can still penetrate. This is considered complete cytoreduction.
Larger residual disease remains. In this situation the benefit of HIPEC is not established and the strategy is reconsidered.
0 if no tumour is present, 1 for implants under 5 mm, 2 up to 5 cm, and 3 above 5 cm or when implants become confluent.
Selection is the single most decisive part of the whole process. These are the factors the board weighs before proposing cytoreductive surgery, with or without HIPEC.
How much disease is present and which abdominal regions are involved, beyond the overall PCI score.
Whether removing all visible disease, or virtually all of it, is realistic. If it is not, surgery loses its curative intent.
Diffuse involvement of the small bowel, its mesentery or the hepatic pedicle is usually the real technical limit of the procedure.
Liver, lung or nodal metastases do not automatically exclude a patient, but they change the strategy and the sequence of treatments.
Histological and molecular features of the primary tumour, which anticipate how the disease will behave over the medium term.
How the disease responded to previous systemic chemotherapy. Progression during treatment is a prognostic signal of considerable weight.
This is a long and demanding operation. The patient's functional, cardiorespiratory and nutritional reserve conditions the indication.
The final decision weighs expected benefit against individual surgical risk, and is always taken by a multidisciplinary board.
Before proposing an operation, the true extent of disease must be estimated as precisely as possible. The work-up is built in layers, adding tests only when they can genuinely change the decision.
The standard first test, with contrast and a full abdominal protocol. It provides an initial estimate of extent and rules out distant disease.
In selected cases. It offers better definition of small peritoneal implants and of small bowel involvement.
Mainly useful to detect disease outside the abdomen, though its sensitivity for millimetric peritoneal implants is limited.
When meaningful doubts about true extent persist. It allows direct inspection of the cavity, PCI estimation and avoids an unnecessary laparotomy.
HIPEC does not replace intravenous chemotherapy. They act over different territories: HIPEC works locally inside the abdominal cavity, while systemic treatment reaches the whole body, including any disease that may exist outside the peritoneum.
In most cases both are combined within a single strategy. Chemotherapy given before surgery also allows the team to observe how the disease behaves, which is a selection criterion in itself: a tumour that responds presents a very different surgical scenario from one that progresses despite treatment.
There is no single figure, and any answer given without reviewing your case should be treated with caution. Prognosis depends mainly on three variables: the origin of the primary tumour, the extent of disease measured by the PCI and, above all, whether complete cytoreduction is achieved.
That last factor changes the picture the most. In well-selected patients in whom all visible disease is removed, published outcomes sit far above those of systemic treatment alone, and around 20% of cases may achieve cure. In the PRODIGE 7 trial, in colorectal peritoneal disease with complete cytoreduction, median survival exceeded 40 months in both study arms.
Tumour origin also makes a substantial difference. Pseudomyxoma peritonei and peritoneal mesothelioma show the best long-term results; ovarian and colorectal origin occupy an intermediate position; gastric origin requires the strictest selection.
Translating these figures into an individual case requires reviewing the imaging, the histology and the prior clinical course. That is precisely the purpose of a second opinion at a specialised unit.
Cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC is a highly complex procedure, and explaining it transparently is part of the treatment. The operation usually lasts between 6 and 12 hours in a single surgical session.
Depending on its magnitude, the first hours may be spent in intensive care. Hospital stay is broadly 7 to 14 days, though this depends on the extent of surgery and individual recovery. After discharge, several weeks are usually needed to regain strength, appetite and the ability to resume daily activities.
As with any major abdominal surgery, it carries risks that should be understood: infection, bleeding, respiratory complications, thrombosis, impaired renal function, delayed return of bowel transit, healing problems at digestive anastomoses, and effects related to the drugs used during HIPEC. Team experience and case volume are consistently associated with lower rates of severe complications, but they do not eliminate them.
Follow-up after discharge includes wound review, analysis of the definitive pathology report and the decision on subsequent systemic treatment.
The fact that complete cytoreduction is not feasible does not mean nothing can be done. It means the goal changes: from potentially curative intent to disease control aimed at gaining time and quality of life.
In that setting systemic treatment remains the backbone, and in selected cases PIPAC may be considered, a pressurised aerosol chemotherapy delivered laparoscopically, far less aggressive than cytoreductive surgery and repeatable over several sessions. It is particularly useful in controlling ascites and the symptoms of peritoneal dissemination.
An initially unfavourable assessment is also not always final. If the disease responds well to systemic treatment, a case can be reassessed and may become surgical.
Answers to the most common questions on diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.
No. It is advanced disease, but in selected patients cytoreductive surgery, with or without HIPEC, can be undertaken with potentially curative intent. Around 20% of well-selected patients achieve cure, although a risk of relapse persists and follow-up remains necessary.
No. Cytoreduction is the surgery that removes all visible tumour implants from the peritoneum and affected organs. HIPEC is the heated chemotherapy perfusion delivered afterwards inside the abdominal cavity, targeting microscopic disease that surgery cannot see. They are two distinct stages of the same operation.
No, and this is one of the most widespread and least accurate assumptions. The indication depends on tumour origin, available protocol, prior treatment and team assessment. The PRODIGE 7 trial showed that in colorectal disease, with short-course oxaliplatin, adding HIPEC did not improve overall survival. What matters most is achieving complete cytoreduction.
No. HIPEC acts locally within the abdomen; systemic chemotherapy reaches the whole body, including any disease outside the peritoneum. They are usually combined within a single strategy rather than being alternatives.
No. The decision is taken by a multidisciplinary board weighing the extent and distribution of disease, the real possibility of removing it completely, small bowel and mesenteric involvement, tumour biology, response to prior treatment, and the patient's general and nutritional status.
It is the scale that quantifies the extent of disease. It divides the abdomen into 13 regions and scores implant size in each from 0 to 3, up to 39 points. A low score is associated with a higher chance of complete cytoreduction, but no figure automatically indicates or rules out surgery: location matters as much as the number.
It is major abdominal surgery and the risks should be understood: infection, bleeding, respiratory complications, thrombosis, renal impairment, delayed return of bowel transit, healing problems at digestive anastomoses, and toxicity from the HIPEC drugs. Case volume and team experience are associated with lower rates of severe complications.
Usually between 6 and 12 hours, in a single operation under general anaesthesia, depending on case complexity and the number of peritonectomies and resections required.
Broadly 7 to 14 days, with a possible initial period in intensive care depending on the magnitude of surgery. After discharge, several weeks are usually needed to regain strength, appetite and usual activity.
Yes, in selected patients with limited recurrence and good general condition. Reoperation is assessed against the same criteria as the first: feasibility of complete cytoreduction and the balance of risk and benefit.
Pseudomyxoma peritonei and peritoneal mesothelioma show the best long-term outcomes. Ovarian and colorectal origin occupy an intermediate position, while gastric origin requires the strictest selection.
The goal shifts to disease and symptom control. Systemic treatment remains the backbone and, in selected cases, PIPAC may be considered, a pressurised aerosol chemotherapy delivered laparoscopically and repeatable over several sessions. If the disease responds well, an initially non-surgical case can be reassessed.
We operate in two private hospitals of reference in Spain. The same medical team treats you in Madrid and Barcelona, with the same surgical and oncological standards.
Private hospital in Pozuelo de Alarcón with a multidisciplinary team specialised in digestive surgical oncology and cutting-edge surgical technology.
View hospital
Internationally recognised private hospital in Barcelona where the team carries out its high-complexity surgical oncology activity.
View hospitalReal testimonies from patients treated by our team in high-complexity surgical oncology.
66-year-old English woman with advanced ovarian cancer and peritoneal metastases. Treated with cytoreduction + HIPEC, she is now disease-free.
Read the full case73-year-old patient with advanced cancer treated with chemotherapy and high-complexity surgical oncology. Excellent survival and quality of life.
Read the full caseA mistaken diagnosis of terminal colon cancer that a second opinion revealed to be pseudomyxoma peritonei, treatable with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC.
Read the full caseDiagnosed with widespread peritoneal carcinomatosis and considered inoperable. After complete cytoreduction with HIPEC, today his is a story of hope and survival.
Read the full caseWonderful surgical team, among the best out there. Dr. Torrent (expert in peritoneal carcinomatosis) is an exceptional surgeon and an even better person. His coordinator is super kind, fast and efficient. The human treatment is great and the results are too. This is of vital importance for cancer patients.
In the public healthcare system they gave my father a maximum of one year to live. They only offered him chemo and no hope, said it was impossible, that nothing could be done. He had several tumors inside the peritoneal sac with metastases. A year and a half later he is clean, completely cured. His latest PET scan came back clean. We are very happy. Thanks to Dr. Torrent and his team. THANK YOU.
Excellent professionals, especially Dr. Torrent, attentive at all times to the patient (my wife), operated for peritoneal pseudomyxoma. They helped us with all our needs since we came from outside Barcelona. Thank you Elisabeth. We are very grateful to Quenet Torrent Institute, thank you for everything.
I am a 63-year-old patient. They detected adrenal gland cancer and told me there was nothing to be done. I sought a second opinion and they told me about the Quenet Torrent team, specialists in complex operations. Dr. Torrent, from the first moment, told me they could operate. They operated and removed a large tumor mass. I spent a week in the ICU and a month on the ward. Every day he came morning and evening, no matter Saturday or Sunday. Never throw in the towel. I am happy to have found these professionals who gave me my life back. Thank you.
Many thanks for your attention. Dr. Torrent always attentive, involved and decisive. The reception staff very pleasant and always offering the best option. 100% RECOMMENDED. THANK YOU.
Dr. Torrent helped me make the best decision at a difficult moment. I think he is a great professional and a person capable of accompanying you and putting himself in another's shoes. Thank you for everything.
I have peritoneal carcinomatosis. Sending my diagnosis to every center, practically all agreed on palliative chemo with little survival time since I had very aggressive cell types. Until we reached Dr. Quenet, Dr. Torrent and their team. I can only confirm what their CV announces: they are far ahead of the rest. They saved my life, at surgery the harmful cells everyone diagnosed (and used to refuse to operate) were not there. This intervention has become the best investment of my life.
The best decision of my life was finding this excellent team of surgeons who saved my husband's life. At a prestigious international clinic in Madrid he was given up for lost with advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal cancer, and thanks to them, the best professionals in this field, he was operated on very successfully. A perfect recovery with no complications, because they were on top of his progress at all times. They have a great quality: from the start they were very honest and close. I can only be deeply grateful; we went to buy time and thanks to them my husband got his life back.
Dr. Torrent is a brilliant surgeon and a very easy-going and polite doctor. When talking with him you can easily grasp his qualities as a professional and human being: perseverance, innate curiosity and passion for learning, humility, honesty and empathy. Having surgery is always an intense experience, anxieties arise and one feels very vulnerable. All of that being said, as his ex-patient I can assure that throughout the process his care and professionalism were absolutely outstanding. I felt safe, supported by him, knowing I was in good hands. I will be forever grateful. Moltes gràcies Dr. Torrent!
Complete the form and schedule your appointment to speak directly with the surgeon.